A politician who drags the position? The ‘Prime Minister and opposition leader were pushed to the’ Speaker ‘of Canada and pushed him

“`html

Canada’s Political Circus: A Shocking Display of Tradition!

This past Tuesday, in what can only be described as a hilarious yet alarming representation of Canada’s adherence to British political traditions, the newly elected Speaker of the House, Francis Scareggia, was literally dragged to his new position by Prime Minister Mark Carner and opposition leader Pierre Poilievre! This absurd spectacle raises the question: Are Canadians truly satisfied with their political absurdities?

The Absurdity of Tradition!

The tradition of dragging a Speaker into position may seem amusing and jovial to some, but rooted in a historical reality that calls for serious scrutiny. In the chaotic days of the English Middle Ages, this position came with a terrifying responsibility: delivering decisions to the king, which could lead to a swift demise depending on His Majesty’s mood!

“Life for a Speaker could end abruptly – they were often dragged out if the king was displeased!”

The term “Speaker” itself originates from this tradition of serving as a messenger, and many met grisly fates. One infamous example is Sir William Laud, who was executed during the glorious revolution! Is this what Canadians want for their representatives?

The Dark Legacy of the office

Let’s not forget more chilling examples – Saint Thomas More, once a Speaker, met his end under Henry VIII’s ruthless reign. It’s no wonder there’s a historical reluctance to serve in this role! Today, instead of fear, what do we have? Laughter at a political circus!

Unseen Rules and Ridiculous Protocols

Yet, the absurdity extends beyond traditional drag-and-drop politics. The Canadian Parliament also observes bizarre rules borrowed from Westminster, such as the prohibition on applause! Instead of clapping, they chant “hear, hear” in agreement, to maintain a facade of decorum. Isn’t this just a cover-up for their lack of genuine enthusiasm for their own government?

In contrast, Canadian MPs are often left voiceless, forced to yield to the outdated practices established centuries ago. They can only speak when standing—no room for passionate debates here!

The Future of Canadian Governance?

As Canadians watch this humiliating spectacle unfold, one has to ponder if this is the future they’re willing to accept. Are we content with keeping politicians on such a tight leash? It is time for serious discussions about whether such traditions should continue to dictate the fate of our democracy!